Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
SOUTH AFRICA: Think Tax compliance is simple? Think again (PART 2) - Academy of Tax Law

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

SOUTH AFRICA: Think Tax compliance is simple? Think again (PART 2)

Table of Contents

The article was written and published by: ReganVanRooy

10 common mistakes in SA corporate tax returns – Part II

CLICK HERE TO READ PART I

Last week we unveiled the first five of our greatest hits in terms of common, and costly, errors in South African tax returns. For those who’ve been waiting with bated breath, here are the final five.

All references are to sections of the South African Income Tax Act, no 58 of 1962. References to “SARS” are to the South African Revenue Service and to “IFRS” are to our beloved International Financial Reporting Standards.

6. Tax treatment of foreign exchange differences

Section 24I governs the treatment of foreign exchange differences for tax purposes. Typically the tax treatment of exchange differences in terms of section 24I accords with the accounting treatment and no adjustment is required in the taxpayer’s tax return assuming the “exchange differences” are recognised in profit or loss for accounting purposes. However, there are exceptions. One such exception is found in section 24I(10A) which provides that the recognition of unrealised exchange differences with non-resident connected persons must be deferred until realised, provided that certain requirements are met. One of these requirements is that no portion of the “exchange item” represents a non-current asset or liability in terms of IFRS. Therefore, if the full balance of the “exchange item” with the non-resident connected person is disclosed in the taxpayer’s annual financial statements as a current asset or a current liability (as the case may be) the deferral rule does not apply. If all the requirements are met, the unrealised exchange differences must be deferred for tax purposes, giving rise to related deferred tax consequences.

7. Donations to section 18A organisations

Taxpayers, including companies, can claim as a deduction from their taxable income amounts donated to any section 18A-approved organisation up to a value of 10% of their taxable income. Any donation made in excess of the 10% limit in any year of assessment will be carried forward and deemed a donation in the following year of assessment eligible for deduction subject to the same limitation. Taxpayers sometimes overlook the following important points concerning section 18A deductions:

For cash donations the amount must be actually paid during the relevant tax year the deduction is claimed – an undertaking/commitment to make the donation followed by payment after year-end is insufficient to claim a deduction in the earlier year;

A section 18A receipt/certificate issued by the section 18 approved organisation to whom the donor made the donation must be available to support the donation. The certificate must specify certain information. If certain information is not contained on the certificate it will be invalid and the deduction may be denied.
 

8. Leases vs instalment sales

Companies that apply IFRS account for “leases” as defined in IFRS 16 as Right of Use assets and a related lease liability in their financial statements whereas companies that apply IFRS for SMEs recognise “finance leases” as assets and a related lease liability in their financial statements.  Tangible assets acquired under instalment sale agreements i.e. an agreement where ownership passes to the debtor on payment of the final instalment are similarly accounted for as assets and related liability. Whereas the accounting treatment for leases/finance leases of tangible assets may be similar to that of tangible assets acquired under an instalment sale agreement, the tax treatment is different. Leases/finance leases are accounted for according to economic substance and not their legal form. For tax purposes, the legal form of the transaction should be followed. Therefore, suitable adjustments to reverse the depreciation and finance charges recognised for accounting purposes and to claim lease payments made should be processed in the taxpayer’s return. Taxpayers often fail to make such tax adjustments. While the adjustments are in the nature of temporary differences which will fully reverse in subsequent years and overall the same deductions will be claimed the pattern of recording is different and taxable income may be understated or overstated in a particular tax year.

9. Items recognised in Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”)

Taxpayers normally determine taxable income using profit or before tax as reported in the statement of comprehensive income as a starting point and making the necessary adjustments required for tax purposes. OCI forms part of the statement of comprehensive income and comprises items of income and expense that are not recognised in profit or loss as required or permitted by IFRS. Since the components of OCI are not considered in determining the net income or loss before tax the normal “mechanics” used to make tax adjustments may not yield the correct tax effect. For example, simply respectively adding back and deducting the closing and opening balances on a post-retirement medical aid provision where actuarial gains or losses are recognised in OCI will not produce the correct tax effect without also adjusting for such gains or losses. Taxpayers, therefore, need to carefully consider the potential impact of components of OCI on the tax computation.

10. Foreign Tax Credits (“FTCs”)

South African domestic legislation (section 6quat) permits an FTC to be claimed against a resident’s SA tax liability for foreign tax suffered on non-SA source income. However, a limitation is imposed according to the following formula: Taxable income from foreign sources/Total taxable income x SA tax payable. Any excess foreign tax credit may be carried forward for seven years. The SA domestic relief may be applied as an alternative to the relief afforded by an applicable Double Taxation Agreement ( DTA). However, certain DTAs e.g. the DTA between South Africa and Namibia, contain a similar limitation. We have noted that in claiming FTCs corporate taxpayers often overlook applying the limitation in either section 6quat or the applicable DTA.

So there you have it, our top ten tips to check in your tax return.  

At Regan van Rooy, we conduct deep-dive tax health checks on your corporate tax returns, either before submission to SARS annually, or as a regular check-in to mitigate risks. We cover all these items in detail.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Compare Programmes

Choose the track that fits your practice focus. All programmes are practitioner-taught, cohort-based, and validated by Middlesex University.

Dimension Transfer Pricing International Taxation South African Tax Law
Jurisdictional audience Global audience, covers all jurisdictions Global audience, covers all jurisdictions South Africa specific, relevant to SADC region
Ideal for TP managers, advisors, in-house tax teams, analysts moving into TP Advisors and managers dealing with cross-border rules, treaties, planning Practitioners working with the SA Income Tax Act, cases, compliance
Core focus Methods, comparables, DEMPE, documentation, audits, dispute defence Treaties, source vs residence, anti-avoidance, PE, relief from double tax Statutory interpretation, case law, assessments, objections, local practice
Primary tools OECD TP Guidelines, UN Manual, BEPS Actions 8–10, 13, case law OECD and UN Models, MLI, BEPS 1.0 and 2.0, domestic rules, cases Income Tax Act, SARS practice notes, Tax Administration Act, SA cases
Assessment style Case-based assignments, file reviews, short written defences Problem questions, treaty interpretation, position papers Problem questions, statutory analysis, case commentary
Typical outcomes Build defensible TP files and strategies, improve audit readiness Design cross-border structures within rules, mitigate double tax Apply SA tax law accurately, manage reviews and disputes
Entry point Start with PG Certificate, progress to PG Diploma, then MSc, or enter later with suitable experience or credits.

Awards Ladder

Award Best for What you achieve Assessment highlights
PG Certificate Foundation to intermediate upskilling Core concepts, frameworks, and applied techniques Short case write ups, timed responses, applied tasks
PG Diploma Expanding technical depth and application Advanced analysis, risk management, documentation quality Integrated case assignments, policy memos, oral defence
MSc Leaders and specialists building authority Capstone project and research backed practice outcomes Research project, viva or presentation, publishable summary

IFF Certificate Courses

Practical, practitioner-led certificates designed for immediate on-the-job application. Each course can stand alone or act as a pathway into our postgraduate tracks.

Dimension Conducting a Transfer Pricing Trial Effectively Managing Tax Teams Indirect Taxation Tax Risk Management
Jurisdictional audience Global audience Global audience Global audience, with local adaptation Global audience
Ideal for In-house tax, TP managers, litigators, advisors preparing for audits, ADR, trial Heads of tax, managers, team leads, controllers, emerging leaders VAT, GST, customs, finance managers, AP, AR, compliance specialists Tax managers, risk officers, controllers, advisors building governance
Core focus Case theory, evidence files, expert reports, witness prep, courtroom strategy Operating models, KPIs, workflows, stakeholder management, coaching VAT design, place of supply, input credits, exemptions, WHT interactions Risk identification, controls, documentation, audit readiness, dispute playbooks
Delivery mode Online, live sessions plus guided self-study Online, live sessions plus guided self-study Online, live sessions plus guided self-study Online, live sessions plus guided self-study
Duration 16 weeks, part-time 16 weeks, part-time 16 weeks, part-time 16 weeks, part-time
Outcomes Confident litigation preparation and defence for TP disputes Stronger execution, clear roles, measurable team performance Reduced VAT errors, better cash flow, fewer surprises at audit Structured governance, fewer findings, faster dispute resolution
Prerequisites TP fundamentals recommended Supervisory experience helpful Basic VAT knowledge helpful General tax experience helpful
Pathway Progress to PG Certificate in Transfer Pricing Progress to Mechanics of Leading Tax Teams, PG Certificate (leadership) Progress to PG programmes, International Tax or SA Tax Law Progress to PG Certificate in International Taxation or Transfer Pricing
Assessment End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected
End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected
End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected
End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected