Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39
SOUTH AFRICA: Replacement of IT14SD forms – New SARS Verification Process - Academy of Tax Law

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/klient.dhosting.pl/purplrocket/staging.academyoftaxlaw.com-ve4i/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

SOUTH AFRICA: Replacement of IT14SD forms – New SARS Verification Process

Table of Contents

AUTHOR: Ziyaad Moosa – PKF Octagon (Johannesburg)

With effect from 16 September 2022, The South African Revenue Services (SARS) discontinued the use of the IT14SD return. This return was previously used by SARS where a taxpayer was selected for verification (which is a high level review of the taxpayer’s income tax return). The IT14SD return required the taxpayer to perform a three-way comparison, between Value-Added Tax, employees’ tax and income tax.

Over the last 2 weeks, SARS has now begun to issue a series of new verification letters to taxpayers in what appears to be the replacement of the old IT14SD process. These letters are system generated and are issued if a taxpayer’s tax return is selected for review by SARS internal risk model.

These verification letters appear to be system generated and call for, at a minimum, the following information:

  • A copy of the taxpayer’s signed annual financial statements;
  • A detailed tax computation together with the supporting documentation and schedules making up the tax computation.

In addition to the above, specific information is also requested from taxpayers that have claimed certain deductions or made certain disclosures on their tax returns. These include, but are not limited to:

  1. copies of S18A certificates confirming donations made;
  2. an explanation as to why the taxpayer incurred a loss for the financial year (if applicable);
  3. an explanation and proof as to why the taxpayer’s 3 largest expenses are considered deductible for tax purposes;
  4. where any assets sold: a detailed fixed asset register reflecting the depreciation rate and rand value, previous allowances claimed and supporting documentation justifying the recoupment (or lack thereof) adjustment on the tax computation;
  5. any other expenditure claimed that SARS may deem as abnormal;
  6. workings and supporting documents where special allowances/incentives are claimed (e.g., the section 24C deduction on future expenditure the relevant contracts may be requested).

At face value, the new requests are less administratively cumbersome to attend to than the old IT14SD requests. The information requested by SARS (financial statements and tax computations) are available at the time of completion of the tax returns and should be readily available for upload by taxpayers.

However, the new risk-based approach adopted by SARS may pose challenges for taxpayers whose documentation is not in order or have not retained the necessary supporting documentation justifying adjustments made to their income tax returns.

In particular, requests relating to historical asset information may pose a challenge if inadequate documentation has been retained by the taxpayer. This is particularly relevant where assets may have been purchased several years prior. The retention of documents may also be beyond the taxpayer’s control where, for example, the taxpayer has had a change in information systems in recent years or the information has been destroyed/lost due to the recent floods and unrest experienced in KwaZulu-Natal and/or parts of Gauteng.

Reviews of the taxpayer’s tax computation by SARS could also lead to further follow up queries by SARS calling for additional documentation or adjustments to the taxpayer’s assessments.

We would therefore recommend that all corporate taxpayers prepare the above information prior to submitting their tax returns. This way, the documentation is readily available in the event of a review and any potential inconsistencies or areas of concern can be identified and corrected prior to the submission of the taxpayer’s tax return.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Compare Programmes

Choose the track that fits your practice focus. All programmes are practitioner-taught, cohort-based, and validated by Middlesex University.

Dimension Transfer Pricing International Taxation South African Tax Law
Jurisdictional audience Global audience, covers all jurisdictions Global audience, covers all jurisdictions South Africa specific, relevant to SADC region
Ideal for TP managers, advisors, in-house tax teams, analysts moving into TP Advisors and managers dealing with cross-border rules, treaties, planning Practitioners working with the SA Income Tax Act, cases, compliance
Core focus Methods, comparables, DEMPE, documentation, audits, dispute defence Treaties, source vs residence, anti-avoidance, PE, relief from double tax Statutory interpretation, case law, assessments, objections, local practice
Primary tools OECD TP Guidelines, UN Manual, BEPS Actions 8–10, 13, case law OECD and UN Models, MLI, BEPS 1.0 and 2.0, domestic rules, cases Income Tax Act, SARS practice notes, Tax Administration Act, SA cases
Assessment style Case-based assignments, file reviews, short written defences Problem questions, treaty interpretation, position papers Problem questions, statutory analysis, case commentary
Typical outcomes Build defensible TP files and strategies, improve audit readiness Design cross-border structures within rules, mitigate double tax Apply SA tax law accurately, manage reviews and disputes
Entry point Start with PG Certificate, progress to PG Diploma, then MSc, or enter later with suitable experience or credits.

Awards Ladder

Award Best for What you achieve Assessment highlights
PG Certificate Foundation to intermediate upskilling Core concepts, frameworks, and applied techniques Short case write ups, timed responses, applied tasks
PG Diploma Expanding technical depth and application Advanced analysis, risk management, documentation quality Integrated case assignments, policy memos, oral defence
MSc Leaders and specialists building authority Capstone project and research backed practice outcomes Research project, viva or presentation, publishable summary

IFF Certificate Courses

Practical, practitioner-led certificates designed for immediate on-the-job application. Each course can stand alone or act as a pathway into our postgraduate tracks.

Dimension Conducting a Transfer Pricing Trial Effectively Managing Tax Teams Indirect Taxation Tax Risk Management
Jurisdictional audience Global audience Global audience Global audience, with local adaptation Global audience
Ideal for In-house tax, TP managers, litigators, advisors preparing for audits, ADR, trial Heads of tax, managers, team leads, controllers, emerging leaders VAT, GST, customs, finance managers, AP, AR, compliance specialists Tax managers, risk officers, controllers, advisors building governance
Core focus Case theory, evidence files, expert reports, witness prep, courtroom strategy Operating models, KPIs, workflows, stakeholder management, coaching VAT design, place of supply, input credits, exemptions, WHT interactions Risk identification, controls, documentation, audit readiness, dispute playbooks
Delivery mode Online, live sessions plus guided self-study Online, live sessions plus guided self-study Online, live sessions plus guided self-study Online, live sessions plus guided self-study
Duration 16 weeks, part-time 16 weeks, part-time 16 weeks, part-time 16 weeks, part-time
Outcomes Confident litigation preparation and defence for TP disputes Stronger execution, clear roles, measurable team performance Reduced VAT errors, better cash flow, fewer surprises at audit Structured governance, fewer findings, faster dispute resolution
Prerequisites TP fundamentals recommended Supervisory experience helpful Basic VAT knowledge helpful General tax experience helpful
Pathway Progress to PG Certificate in Transfer Pricing Progress to Mechanics of Leading Tax Teams, PG Certificate (leadership) Progress to PG programmes, International Tax or SA Tax Law Progress to PG Certificate in International Taxation or Transfer Pricing
Assessment End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected
End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected
End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected
End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected