KENYA: High Court ruling on Mauritius treaty

Table of Contents

By ENS Africa update –

KENYA: High Court ruling on Mauritius treaty

On 15 March 2019, The High Court of Kenya gave its decision in the case of Tax Justice Network Africa (TJN-A) v. Cabinet Secretary for the National Treasury, The Kenya Revenue Authority and The Attorney General (Petition No 494 of 2014) regarding the constitutionality of the double tax agreement between Kenya and Mauritius.

Kenya and Mauritius concluded the treaty on 11 May 2012 and on 23 May 2014, the Cabinet Secretary to Treasury published Legal Notice No. 59 of 2014 on the enactment of the treaty.

TJN-A argued that the treaty was unconstitutional on the basis that:

  • it limited Kenya’s taxing rights under various articles and, in doing so, undermined Kenya’s ability to attain sustainable development;
  • the treaty contains a five-year restriction on its termination;
  • the treaty waives a tax that is imposed by the Constitution and such waiving demands public participation, transparency and accountability; and
  • its enactment failed to follow the process laid out in the Treaty Making and Ratification Act, 2012 (“TMRA”).

The Kenya Revenue Authority and Attorney General argued that:

  • the limitation of Kenya’s taxing rights is necessary to attract investment;
  • termination is allowed after five years so as to allow investors time to adjust and oversee the implementation of the treaty; and
  • tax treaties are not treaties as defined under the TMRA and are therefore exempt from the process laid out by the TMRA.

The court held that:

  • the involvement of the Kenya Revenue Authority and the Attorney General’s office met the requirement of public participation, as it showed openness and accountability;
  • the treaty had some form of ratification as required since both states agreed to be bound by it, and the process of its formulation was open and transparent;
  • however, the Legal Notice that was intended to domesticate it was void because it was not tabled before parliament within the time required by the Statutory Instruments Act, 2013.

Although the court’s decision did not invalidate the treaty, it does not have current legal effect in Kenya. The Cabinet Secretary is to issue a new Legal Notice and ensure full compliance with the Statutory Instruments Act, including presenting it; with all the required information, on time to parliament.

KENYA: New Treaty with Mauritius signed

Following the outcome of above court case, Kenya and Mauritius signed a new tax treaty in Port Louis on 10 April 2019. Details of the new treaty are yet to be published.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top

Compare Programmes

Choose the track that fits your practice focus. All programmes are practitioner-taught, cohort-based, and validated by Middlesex University.

Dimension Transfer Pricing International Taxation South African Tax Law
Jurisdictional audience Global audience, covers all jurisdictions Global audience, covers all jurisdictions South Africa specific, relevant to SADC region
Ideal for TP managers, advisors, in-house tax teams, analysts moving into TP Advisors and managers dealing with cross-border rules, treaties, planning Practitioners working with the SA Income Tax Act, cases, compliance
Core focus Methods, comparables, DEMPE, documentation, audits, dispute defence Treaties, source vs residence, anti-avoidance, PE, relief from double tax Statutory interpretation, case law, assessments, objections, local practice
Primary tools OECD TP Guidelines, UN Manual, BEPS Actions 8–10, 13, case law OECD and UN Models, MLI, BEPS 1.0 and 2.0, domestic rules, cases Income Tax Act, SARS practice notes, Tax Administration Act, SA cases
Assessment style Case-based assignments, file reviews, short written defences Problem questions, treaty interpretation, position papers Problem questions, statutory analysis, case commentary
Typical outcomes Build defensible TP files and strategies, improve audit readiness Design cross-border structures within rules, mitigate double tax Apply SA tax law accurately, manage reviews and disputes
Entry point Start with PG Certificate, progress to PG Diploma, then MSc, or enter later with suitable experience or credits.

Awards Ladder

Award Best for What you achieve Assessment highlights
PG Certificate Foundation to intermediate upskilling Core concepts, frameworks, and applied techniques Short case write ups, timed responses, applied tasks
PG Diploma Expanding technical depth and application Advanced analysis, risk management, documentation quality Integrated case assignments, policy memos, oral defence
MSc Leaders and specialists building authority Capstone project and research backed practice outcomes Research project, viva or presentation, publishable summary

IFF Certificate Courses

Practical, practitioner-led certificates designed for immediate on-the-job application. Each course can stand alone or act as a pathway into our postgraduate tracks.

Dimension Conducting a Transfer Pricing Trial Effectively Managing Tax Teams Indirect Taxation Tax Risk Management
Jurisdictional audience Global audience Global audience Global audience, with local adaptation Global audience
Ideal for In-house tax, TP managers, litigators, advisors preparing for audits, ADR, trial Heads of tax, managers, team leads, controllers, emerging leaders VAT, GST, customs, finance managers, AP, AR, compliance specialists Tax managers, risk officers, controllers, advisors building governance
Core focus Case theory, evidence files, expert reports, witness prep, courtroom strategy Operating models, KPIs, workflows, stakeholder management, coaching VAT design, place of supply, input credits, exemptions, WHT interactions Risk identification, controls, documentation, audit readiness, dispute playbooks
Delivery mode Online, live sessions plus guided self-study Online, live sessions plus guided self-study Online, live sessions plus guided self-study Online, live sessions plus guided self-study
Duration 16 weeks, part-time 16 weeks, part-time 16 weeks, part-time 16 weeks, part-time
Outcomes Confident litigation preparation and defence for TP disputes Stronger execution, clear roles, measurable team performance Reduced VAT errors, better cash flow, fewer surprises at audit Structured governance, fewer findings, faster dispute resolution
Prerequisites TP fundamentals recommended Supervisory experience helpful Basic VAT knowledge helpful General tax experience helpful
Pathway Progress to PG Certificate in Transfer Pricing Progress to Mechanics of Leading Tax Teams, PG Certificate (leadership) Progress to PG programmes, International Tax or SA Tax Law Progress to PG Certificate in International Taxation or Transfer Pricing
Assessment End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected
End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected
End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected
End of module progress assessment

5000-word assignment if PG-Cert option elected